2007 Post Season Test Race Recap

 

Fresh off of the completion of our 14th season of racing, we at Classic Thunder set out to do a little R&D at Coulon Park.  We held a test race to stage further testing that began earlier this year.   We needed to gather more information before making important decisions on possible additions to the rulebook for specifications in both divisions of racing.  We had several ready and willing boats on hand from both classes, which set the groundwork for what turned out to be a good test day.  Battery Dave was on hand with a data logger and laptop and Bill McGraw provided some numbers from his radar gun too.  With all of that and a handy stopwatch, we were able to collect some meaningful data.

 

Our first line of business was to continue testing the Quannum 36-55 brushless motor in Division 1.  We began this testing in Lacey earlier in the year in a post-race test heat and some solo runs done by Jeff Howard with his two time champion 64 Budweiser.  We put the motor in that boat because he had driven it in competition for more years than most of the other boats and we knew its performance to be top notch with the Astro 25.  We had been testing other brushed motors with it last year for the same reason.  Our other test bed was Mark Beatty’s Miss Timex, which began the season running the Astro 25 and finished the season running a Plettenberg motor.  Mark had run some solo testing on the Quannum with his Checkerboard Bardahl over the last couple of weeks and decided to put it in his main boat for this test.  It helps to see boats we’ve been racing against all year for a good comparison and the Timex was one of our top performers. It’s good to do this while the performances are still fresh in our minds from the season.  Jeff ran an Octura 447 and Mark opted for a Graupner 45 for the day.  The motor performed well using both.

 

We purposely separated the two test boats from each other in the heats but had everyone on the stopwatch.  We saw consistent times of between 1:23 and 1:25 from both boats over 5 laps in two different heats.  Comparably, we saw times from other top notch boats running Astro 25’s included former champion Miss Seattle (who ran a 1:22 and a 1:23) and current champion Slo-Mo IV (who ran 1:24 and a 1:23) over 5 laps.  Mike Krone’s Miss Seattle Too had elapsed times that were right in that range too.  The results were consistent with what we saw during the season for the most part too.  Basically we were able to further confirm what we already suspected.  With regards to performances related to speed, the Quannum 36-55 is everything we could have hoped for as a brushless addition to the brushed motors currently allowed for Division 1. An added bonus was the information derived from using the data logger in several of the brushed and brushless boats during the day.  As anticipated, the more efficient brushless motor was drawing about 10 fewer amps to produce the same performance as the Astro 25’s.  All other things remaining constant, you could feasibly put less strain on your batteries using that setup and and possibly extend their useful life.  You certainly would see longer run times across the board.

 

The other continued experiment dealt with the power sources in Division 2.  For months we’ve been reading about, studying and asking questions about Lipo packs for boat racing and what folks thought to be comparable to what we run now.  Many clubs all over the country are dealing with this dilemma in trying to accommodate those who want to run Nimh and those who want to bring Lipo power into their rulebooks.  We’ve seen pros and cons to both options.  It’s now gotten to a point where more is known about Lipos, their care and capabilities and the safety precautions you need to take in order to use them wisely.  We decided to investigate the use of a 4s Lipo pack for Division 2 and compare it in performance to the 14 cells Nimh or Nicad that are currently allowed.  I spent a lot of time talking with many racers at Nationals earlier this year and joined in the competition partially to help showcase 1/10th scale racing, but also to see how my Nimh powered Trendwest would perform head to head in competition against other boats running 4s Lipo packs.  I also spent a long time talking to some very technical guys from Puget Sound Fast Electrics, who have dealt with the same issue in planning for their classes of racing for the last couple of years.  We all agreed that there is no comparison between the performance of a boat using Lipo 4s power and the same boat using 12 cells of any sub-c power source.  Competition in the vintage class of racing, which also allowed 4s Lipo for Nationals confirmed that very soundly.  A 12 cell pack obviously couldn’t compete, giving less voltage and more weight than the 4s Lipo.  The consensus was that 14 cells would definitely be a better comparison hands down.  Competition in the Modern class confirmed that too.  That being said, Pete Schille’s Boss Marine and my Trendwest ran 14 cells (mainly 3600’s and 4200’s) for part of the day against some very fast 14 cell boats which included Mark’s Lite All-Star and a brand new Miss Exide 2-wing boat from Mike Schultz among others.  Visually you couldn’t see any significant performance differences overall.  Basically, the Trendwest performed like it did during the 2007 season.  The only thing that I did notice while running the Lipo 4s pack was that it may have been slightly down on top end in the straights, but it certainly made up for it getting in and out of the corners.  Overall, the difference was subtle, if not just my imagination.  Those who witnessed it, agreed that the performance change was negligible. 

 

I appreciate the guys coming out to run their boats because it really gave us a good look.  It’s important that we do our best to offer comparable choices of motors and power sources.  The nominal voltage and the weight (not to mention chemistry) of the Lipo packs are very different than the 14 cell Nimh that we are used to, but they seem to match up very well. The Quannum motor looks great for what we’re trying to maintain in Division 1.

 

Immediately after the conclusion of the Seahawks game and a good meal at Kidd Valley, the 5 executive committee members met to go over ideas and issues including the test results and what was learned during 2007.  We’re trying to get things settled and get information out to the club as soon as possible for those planning and building for the 2008 season.  Based on what we have learned, it was decided that the Quannum 36-55 brushless motor will also be allowed in Division 1 along with any brushed motors for 2008.  It was also decided that the 4s Lipo will be allowed to run in Division 2 along with 14 cell sub-c’s in 2008.  We feel like these changes will provide members with some good options to choose from without inherently gaining or losing a significant advantage.  I imagine it will make things easier for new members and current members to plan for the upcoming seasons.  Undoubtedly we will have to revisit the issue of power sources in years to come, but we think this is a step in a good direction.  Thanks for everyone who helped in gathering information and aided in the testing processes. 

 

We’ll be having at least a couple of sit down club meetings during the off-season to discuss annual club elections, other rule changes, issues and ideas.  The Execs will need input from the membership on various things that have been brought up during the 2007 season and to get new suggestions for consideration.  That will all start to happen after we’ve had our season banquet in October.  We’ll talk some more then.  Again, thanks for all of the cooperation and help during the season and with the test race and everything else.  This was a really fun season.  We’ll be announcing the date and time for the banquet very soon.  I hope most if not all of you will be able to be there.  It’ll be fun.  Hope to see you there.

 

Sincerely,

 

Mitch Dillard

Classic Thunder Commissioner

 

 Back to Home Page

Back to CT News